case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-12-12 07:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #4724 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4724 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #676.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2019-12-13 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
I want to agree with you but your entire comment still doesn't cover the core problem that the secret is highlighting-- that fandom (in its current state) will see a woman that's not traditionally feminine and will immediately label her nb/trans. It's like clockwork now. Meanwhile, you could say that the ultra-feminine one is nb/trans, and the non-feminine one is as cis as they come, but fandom won't do it. In your example, we're all sitting at a goddamn smorgasbord and only putting a couple of peas on our plates, only to complain that the hosts are starving us.