[ SECRET POST #4748 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4748 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #680.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

They’re the harasser

[(Anonymous)]

1) Forstater harassed them on company time
2) Neither of them being dipshits makes their harassment okay. Both can be dipshits.
But 3) Still doesn't mean we get to misgender them.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm glad that you think harassment is bad, and I assume you disagree with Forstater's position, which is (according to the mediating judge) that her opinion on a stranger's identity does giver her the right to harass them.

[(Anonymous)]

Murray was the person who Forstater “misgendered”

[(Anonymous)]

They can still be misgendered even if they're a shit person. Stop putting it in quotes, dumbass.

[(Anonymous)]

"I conclude from this, and from the totality of the evidence, that [Forstater] is absolutist in her view of sex and it is a core component of her belief that she will refer to a person by the sex she considered appropriate even if it violates their dignity and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment... [Forstater] could generally avoid the huge offense caused by calling a trans woman a man without having to refer to her as a woman, as it is often not necessary to refer to a person's sex at all... I do not accept that there is a failure to to engage with the importance of [Forstater's] qualified right to freedom of expression, as it is legitimate to exclude a belief that necessarily harms the rights of others... The human rights balancing approach goes against [Forstater] because of the absolutist approach she adopts."

It is by no means clear to me how any kind of misdeed by Murray could support the contention by Forstater that she has an absolute right to misgender people even when doing so constitutes harassment.

[(Anonymous)]

I get it, you wanna misgender them, too. It just outs you as a transphobe.