[ SECRET POST #4748 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4748 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 41 secrets from Secret Submission Post #680.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

So you would have to go deeper and actually look at data and see if there actually is an enduring, systematic advantage derived from having a male body. It isn't actually something that you can just assert as common sense and assume that it exists. And, in fact, looking at the data, there really is not any compelling reason to think that such an advantage does exist yet.

Are. Are you kidding me with this? So, the extremely well-documented fact that competitive male athletes statistically out preform competitive female athletes, consistently, in almost every sport on record, is somehow not compelling enough data for you? You somehow don't think it suggest that a biological advantage exists?


Or are to talking specifically about male bodies that are on hormone blockers? If you're talking about the latter, specifically, then okay, yeah, I agree that it's by no means an open and shut case, and I'd want to see more data.

[(Anonymous)]

??? Yeah, we're discussing trans people. Hormone treatments tend to factor in, usually. Hence the need for study.