case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-01-11 03:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #4754 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4754 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #681.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-01-11 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
And the secret is specifically about an entirely-not anthropomorphic dragon.

Yes, I am saying that the secret is about monster sex, not furry. Although (again) I think it's furry-adjacent either way.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2020-01-11 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)
And I personally don't think there is a real difference between the two.

(Anonymous) 2020-01-11 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
DA but think of it like a Venn Diagram. Venom and the Asset from Shape of Water are on the monsterfucker side, furries and scalies are on the other. In the middle, there's stuff like werewolves and dragons.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2020-01-11 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
That makes sense to me, actually. Them being completely distinct doesn't given there seems to be more in common between things of the same level of anthropomorphization in the two different categories than they would have with other things in their own category. Like, a werewolf would have more in common with a dog furry than a dragon. But the Venn diagram idea makes more sense to me.

(Anonymous) 2020-01-12 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
For a lot of furries though, it's an animal-humanoid with a human level of intelligence.

Lots of furries aren't interested in quadrupeds with a human level of intelligence, like a whole-ass dragon. Some are, which is why there's a weird amount of Lion King smut, but it's not necessarily a furry thing. Lots also aren't into a relatively humanoid animal with an entirely animal level of intelligence, like a werewolf (depending on the werewolf).

Furries (like from Zootopia, Road Rovers, Bucky O'Hare whatever, your standard anthro animal design) go with like... humanoid aliens in one venn circle. Vinnie from Biker Micer sits with Garrus and Predator. It's just how it is. Then shit like Red XIII, intelligent dragons and Nala or w/e go in another circle with any animal-like smart aliens. Then there's the weird shit like Pokemon and Toothless in another one. Reasonably smart, not human intelligence, but people wanna fuck them anyway for some reason.

Then the crossover is shit like werewolves. Can have human intelligence, don't always.... some do, some don't, different interpretations. They variously appeal to some furries, some monsterfuckers and ... the other group.

Monsterfuckers probably won't have much interest in furries, because they're not monsters, they're animal people. Likewise, strict furries aren't going to want to get dirty with Mothman because it's not an anthro animal as such.

It's definitely on the same graph of general weird non-human interest, but they can be distinct from one another and while crossover is certainly possible, it's not a given that it will be.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2020-01-12 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, I get that it isn't a given they will cross over. I just don't think it is a given that they are totally distinct. They don't seem to me to be hard line separate categories where it would be easy to define everything as one category or another and nothing ever overlapped.