[ SECRET POST #4758 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4758 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Witcher]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Mass Effect Trilogy]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Emma (2020)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Saiyuki]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #681.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

So, you don't think Dracula got any joy out of acting erotically with his victims? He played the part strictly for a meal? And he wouldn't be capable of hunting humans if he didn't put on a show?

[philstar22]

Yes, he did, but again, the eroticism wasn't his goal. He was about the homicide. He got something out of his methods, certainly, but there is no evidence whatsoever that what he got out of it was sexual. Everything we see of Dracula shows that his motivations are murderous and homicidal. His methods increased the suffering of his victims, and that's what he got out of it. His methods were a game pitting him against them, and that's what he got of it. But he didn't get off on it sexually. He's not a sexual being.