case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-01-15 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #4758 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4758 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Witcher]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Mass Effect Trilogy]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Emma (2020)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Saiyuki]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #681.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-01-16 06:06 am (UTC)(link)
DA

It's not about being controversial, it's about the original intention of the author. Dracula is meant to be a monster. People, over time, have interpreted this to be erotic, but that doesn't make it true. There isn't an act because there isn't any hidden purpose to be interpreted. (in this case by the intention of the writer) The same way that Mummy's became a thing by Penny Dreadful's prosing that the dead inside a sarcophagus (which people used to decorate their living rooms with) can come to life and take advantage of the homeowners wife. It's popculture.