Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-01-18 03:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #4761 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4761 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 52 secrets from Secret Submission Post #682.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

I liked the first one.
(Anonymous) 2020-01-18 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)I didn't watch the second one because I didn't think I would like it, just like I didn't watch the third in the previous run.
Given the nature of the rights' deal, with them having to churn out something new within a set time, not just when someone has a good idea, it's almost inevitable that some Spider-Man movies are going to suck.
But no, I don't think there was a conspiracy of any sort. Though I wouldn't be entirely surprised if Andrew Garfield had wanted Spider-Man to be bi, he seemed sort of tired of the whole promotional machine (and maybe wasn't that excited over The Amazing Spider-Man 2) and there was the big to-do over not showing for an announcement and Sony people did seem pissed about that.
Re: I liked the first one.
(Anonymous) 2020-01-18 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I liked the first one.
(Anonymous) 2020-01-18 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)