case: ([ Snake; Moeface. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-11-08 04:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #673 ]


⌈ Secret Post #673 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.


__________________________________________________



104.


__________________________________________________



105.


__________________________________________________



106.


__________________________________________________



107.


__________________________________________________



108.


__________________________________________________



109.


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.


__________________________________________________



118.
[Twilight Hotel]


__________________________________________________



119.


__________________________________________________



120. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.


__________________________________________________



123.


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126. [not secret]


__________________________________________________



127.


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.


__________________________________________________



133.


__________________________________________________



134.


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.


__________________________________________________



142.


__________________________________________________



143.


__________________________________________________



144.


__________________________________________________



145.


__________________________________________________



146.


__________________________________________________



147.


__________________________________________________



148.


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.



Notes:

CITY STUFF → http://lolbuttsex.myminicity.com/

Secrets Left to Post: 14 pages, 348 secrets from Secret Submission Post #096.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[identity profile] angathol.livejournal.com 2008-11-09 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
I'm well aware that South Park also has things of that nature, but it doesn't entirely REVOLVE around it. The whole point of the show isn't to sexualize kids, and when it does so, it's in a humorous "gross-out" manner, not to titillate its audience. The audience and the context are entirely different.

You must've grown up with a bunch of kids who had absolutely no sense of discipline. Congrats.

In after attempted justifications. I honestly doubt that this series is as "deep" as people claim. No matter how much backstory they throw in there, their target audience isn't your average Joe, and side stories about getting eight-year-old Tits McGee a bra isn't character development. The whole thing is fanservice with a contrived excuse for a plot.

(Anonymous) 2008-11-09 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
Kodomo no Jikan doesn't evolve around the fanservice either. It's point is not to sexualized kids either. Rin's behavior is treated not acceptable in the series either.

No, kids would be kids. Maybe you grew up in a more sheltered area?

Says a person who didn't even read the series. You just based it on hearsay and judge it without knowing. How's that better than Kenny's dream of breasts or whatnot? It's treated as comedy as that episode and it deals with Mimi's being uncomfortable about developing faster than a normal girl.

And eight year old with bras isn't as unthinkable as you think since I was one of them and with obesity and the shit people eat, girls are getting their periods that young.

[identity profile] angathol.livejournal.com 2008-11-09 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Kodomo no Jikan doesn't evolve around the fanservice either.
Says a person who didn't even read the series.

Nice try. I'd already read several chapters months ago, and attempted to pick it up again tonight in the hopes of maybe, just maybe, seeing it from a different point of view. But no, it's the same sexualized drivel. The main character is an older version of Keitaro with an underaged harem. Faaaaaaantastic. I honestly can't understand why people defend this bullshit excuse for a series.

And sheltered? Try civilized.

Where did I say that an eight-year-old wearing a bra was unthinkable? That chapter was an excuse for another sexualized scene between underage girls.

But of course, since I can't be bothered to force myself through any more of this drivel that people somehow actually enjoy, I'm clearly close-minded! If I have to plow through pages upon pages of little girls in skimpy outfits flashing their panties at their teacher just to get to the actual REASON why Rin is The Littlest Cocktease (which I'm sure 90% of the audience isn't hanging on for), it's not worth reading.

But hey, let's agree to disagree. You can justify your lolicon series all you like. I'll be moving onto series where the main catch ISN'T a sexualized child. Have an awesome day, anon!

(Anonymous) 2008-11-09 03:04 am (UTC)(link)
Nice try. I'd already read several chapters months ago, and attempted to pick it up again tonight in the hopes of maybe, just maybe, seeing it from a different point of view. But no, it's the same sexualized drivel. The main character is an older version of Keitaro with an underaged harem. Faaaaaaantastic. I honestly can't understand why people defend this bullshit excuse for a series.

Funnily, when I read that, I didn't see that. Plus, he doesn't have a harem. The only girl that likes Aoki is Rin and it's unrequited. Kuro despises Aoki for taking Rin's attention and actually thinks he's a threat and only hangs around to protect Rin. Mimi likes Reiji and she follows around Rin and Kuro although it seems Rin's influence might be rubbing off her for all the wrong reasons. And Aoki isn't interested in Rin at all and wants to help her. Plus the fanservice tones down to the point it doesn't even show up for chapters.

And sheltered? Try civilized.
I think it's more sheltered. That is typical behavior for boys. Boys are rowdy in nature.

Actually, many people I encounter don't read it for the lolicon. Hell, even the perverts who thought it was going to be that kind of series were severely disappointed or surprised that the series actually had a plot and not all about TEH lolicon.
Well, I leave off with your ignorance!