[ SECRET POST #4784 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4784 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 40 secrets from Secret Submission Post #685.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[sparklywalls]

I don't know much about the musical but I learned recently that the part is given to a man.

Ngl the idea of a woman being made up to be ugly (and "large") comes with a lot of baggage with that part but that still sits better with me than casting a man. But as I said, I don't know the musical and all the traditions built around it. So I'm not gonna judge from that angle. I AM gonna judge from the point of view that Ralph Fiennes seems like a weird choice.

[(Anonymous)]

It's the Royal Shakespeare Company and it was their Christmas production so I reckon it was their tradition of gender-blind casting & panto tradition which led to Bertie Carvel as Trunchball (he was absolutely stunning though)

I have no doubt there are many older, larger female actors out there who'd kill for a chance to play Trunchball. I'd definitely love to see it happen.