[ SECRET POST #4790 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4790 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #686.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, sure examine them all you want, but as a fellow anon said upthread, if you're being a judgey douche in a public space, it's you who deserves criticism, not the person whose kinks you're needlessly judging.

And deciding for oneself, without evidence of any kind, that people harbor homophobic sentiments, simply because of what they kink on in fucking fiction, is being a judgey douche, whether you get that or not.

second, i can definitely criticize tropes for being homophobic and sexist, lmao, but you feeling as though criticism of porn is the same as a personal criticism is really ironic

Also good for a laugh? You apparently not having bothered to read the thread you're jumping into:

ngl i think some of it comes from internalized or unaddressed homophobia--they want to ship the gay thing, but can't go all in unless they can "womanize" one of the men so that it blurs the lines and resembles a more "traditional" het ship

See that there? That is very much not criticizing the trope without criticizing the individual. It's kind of the opposite, actually. If they'd stuck with criticizing the trope, rather than being a judgey douche who presumes to know other peoples hearts and minds better than they themselves do, based on nothing more than a kink they like in fiction, I wouldn't have bothered to argue with them in the first place. FFS.

[(Anonymous)]

YES! Thank you! Could not agree more.

[(Anonymous)]

That's certainly an aggressive reading of the comment.

[(Anonymous)]

Nayrt - Really? Because I dont even have this kink but it seems like a pretty straightforward reading to me. Maybe just dont accuse people you dont know of internalized homophobia when you have nothing to actually base it on. Because doing that is what seems like an aggressive take.

[meadowphoenix]

if you're being judgy on the fic? sure, there's enough fandom convention for that to be considered rude. in a public space? that's fundamentally ridiculous. but i'll assume you had these same problems with 50 shades' (and the author's) very public disapprobation out of benefit of the doubt and just say you are 4000 or so years to late for this type of media criticism dislike.

the evidence is the fic. and this is true of any and all media criticism, lmao.

did you read the rest of my comment. it's funny and ironic that you have a problem with it because you're so on about some things just being personal (kink) but you are claiming it's ridiculous for people reading it to think it's personal (thinking). it's hilarious.