case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-02-21 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #4795 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4795 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


Spoilers and CWs ahead!



__________________________________________________





02. [SPOILERS for The Good Place]



__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Sanditon]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Guilded Age]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Star Trek: Picard]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

[Graceling]


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of substance abuse]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of abuse/assault]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of incest/underage/etc. Not the main topic but figured it might start discussion]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #686.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-02-22 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
The fact that you still don't like the real summary also doesn't change the fact that the way the OP described the book is a gross oversimplification that implies it has different intentions than it does. You don't want to read about rape at all and that's OK, but that's not the same as someone who only doesn't want to read about rape as the sole or main source of trauma for a woman, and the OP implied that the book was about the latter when it isn't.