case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-02-21 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #4795 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4795 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


Spoilers and CWs ahead!



__________________________________________________





02. [SPOILERS for The Good Place]



__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for Sanditon]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Guilded Age]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Star Trek: Picard]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of rape]

[Graceling]


__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of substance abuse]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of abuse/assault]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of incest/underage/etc. Not the main topic but figured it might start discussion]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #686.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-02-22 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Anyone who is opposed to Louis CK and calling him a sexual predator is almost certainly also applying the same standard to Roman Polanski and almost certainly strongly disagrees with Hollywood's willingness to let Polanski off the hook. This is an almost entirely toothless point.