[ SECRET POST #4799 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4799 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 20 secrets from Secret Submission Post #687.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Thirding this. You mean DISCOURAGING. Gawd, maybe if allowed, you'd be telling students all about "feminate disturbian literature" or the "seminarian works" of "people of collar"...

[Also, as a lit teacher - yes, we should teach a wide variety, and yes, teach works previously ignored or suppressed, and yes, obviously, teach new texts. But teach them in addition to those old texts by old white men. Without a basis in canonical texts, references to and rebellion from them become meaningless.]

[(Anonymous)]

da

I thought the OP meant "dispiriting."

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT
Ah, of course - "dispirited" is also highly likely to have been the intended word. I was just too discouraged by the poster's spelling (and having too much fun disparaging their efforts) to think of that.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

Hee!

[(Anonymous)]

+1