[ SECRET POST #4813 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4813 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #689.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Okay, but animal keeping isn't some new thing. Zoos exist and there is no reason they would not consult them in order to create happy environments for their animals.

[(Anonymous)]

Zoos are old-school and moribund. This is a dynamic new biotech and entertainment company that's disrupting the paradigm of zoos. They're trying to build a whole new kind of experience so obviously they're smart enough to not need to take advice from a bunch of zoo fogeys.

[(Anonymous)]

They're still working with living animals in enclosed spaces and hiring people skilled in handling animals to handle the animals, so....

[(Anonymous)]

Why would you hire people skilled in the handling of animals when you can just build an app that'll let recent college graduates be just as capable at half the price and that will definitely guaranteed work. It's like you don't even want to be a billionaire.

[(Anonymous)]

Because animals are expensive and you don't want them to die? And dinosaurs would be EXTRA expensive, so much so that the cost of hiring skilled professionals would likely be much less than having to create another dinosaur from scratch.

[(Anonymous)]

NA

Zoos do exist and, up until recently, big circuses did too, along with aquariums like Sea World. But I feel like you've never read about rampaging elephants or killer whales who've killed their trainers or zoo bears or rhinos or tigers who've attacked.

[(Anonymous)]

Do you know why those animals attack? Is it:

A) because they're just vicious and wild and guaranteed to attack always

or B) because in shitty environments like circuses and sea world where they're actively tortured for entertainment and/or completely deprived of adequate stimulation and interaction, they tend to become violent in their absolute misery and lash out.

[(Anonymous)]

But I think the point is, if we know that existing environments like circuses and sea shows are willing to mistreat and torture their expensive hard-to-acquire valuable animals out of cheapness or laziness or evil, what's stopping the same from happening with dinosaurs

[(Anonymous)]

ayrt

It makes absolutely no difference. Because how on earth could you guarantee that a dinosaur in any kind of park could be happy and wouldn't lash out? There are no predictable behaviors, they haven't been studied in the wild, and even if they had been, the biological changes that they spell out in the films would affect their behavior. I'm saying even with the benefit of experience and expertise that exists for the animals that we have now (whether it is utilized or not), animals in captivity can be and have been dangerous.