[ SECRET POST #4824 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4824 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #691.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: warning: coronavirus talk

[(Anonymous)]

I missed that pile-on, but I'm not surprised. This comm can be really mean. I mostly lurk myself.

Recession is the scarier issue for me, too. There are going to be so many people suddenly without an income. This is not going to just blow over. We're looking at possibly a year or more of periodic lock-downs. People will not be able to afford food or rent. The government will not be able to support them with so much lost tax revenue and an already huge debt. This is such a no-brainer that I'm shocked people argued with you about it. The virus might affect 10% of the US population. The recession will affect everyone not at the very top.

Re: warning: coronavirus talk

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, sure, living without an income is bad. But being dead or severely sick with income and then lisevit due to sickness is worse.

Re: warning: coronavirus talk

[(Anonymous)]

The mortality rate is 3%. The inevitable recession will affect 98%.

Re: warning: coronavirus talk

[(Anonymous)]

Just because the mortality rate isn't that high (and btw it has gotten up to 10% in some regions), getting sick with it can lead to health complications that will render you unable to work for the rest of your life. Not to mention saying that "haha, just a select few people die" is a pretty disgusting Social Darwinist POV and you don't know at all in what ways the economy will actually be affected in the end.

Re: warning: coronavirus talk

[(Anonymous)]

The most worrying thing is not the mortality rate though, it's the rate of people needing intensive/hospital care at the same given time

Re: warning: coronavirus talk

[(Anonymous)]

Yes, this. In Italy, doctors have to make the decision which person they will prioritise and which ones they will potentially have to let die because things are so out of control.

Re: warning: coronavirus talk

[(Anonymous)]

The mortality rate is three percent in places with enough doctors, nurses, hospital beds, ventilators, and ventilator techs. There are counties in my state, California, with 200,000 people and one hospital with 20 beds and one ventilator. Small rural hospitals can try and send extra patients to larger regional hospitals, but with their larger populations, they’ll likely also be full if this spreads unchecked.

I have been in an ambulance being routed between hospitals because one is full; it’s not a situation you ever want to be in. Especially because other medical emergencies don’t stop during a pandemic. People still have heart attacks and step on nails and break bones and use the wrong cleaning products together in the bathroom.

And if you don’t think an extra three percent of the world population dropping dead in the space of a few months will have scary economic effects, I don’t know what to tell you.