case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-03-29 03:05 pm

[ SECRET POST #4832 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4832 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #692.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Based on secret 1

(Anonymous) 2020-03-30 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
Stark's depiction in the films is deeply privileged in many, many ways and his disability is presented as basically a narrative issue. It surfaces in ways that are connected with the main emotional plot beats of the respective movies, and generally not otherwise. In part this is because of the massive privilege that otherwise characterizes his situation in life.

Of course, any real person in Stark's position would obviously be profoundly affected by their disability (as well as the many other crippling emotional issues, PTSD, etc). But the relevant question here is how Stark is narratively portrayed, what happens in the on-screen depiction.