[ SECRET POST #4839 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4839 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #693.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Question about Good Omens show

[(Anonymous)]

The relationship isn't romantic or sexual in the show, but if it would have ended that way there would have been enough build up to make it believable. To me, both interpretations of their relationship are equally valid. There's a lot of shipping fodder.

If you're looking for explicit confirmation of the ship in canon then it's not for you, imo.

Re: Question about Good Omens show

[morieris]

This. I see it, and I get why people didn't.

Re: Question about Good Omens show

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, I don't care about explicit confirmation, just not a "spend the entire show seeming to lead up to something, then make it clear that anyone who interpreted it that way is an idiot" kind of thing. I'm fine with 'open to interpretation as long', I'm just trying to avoid "let's act like they have feelings for each other, then throw in a 'THEY'RE TOTALLY STRAIGHT, YOU'RE AN IDIOT FOR EVER THINKING OTHERWISE' at the end" situation, and it doesn't sound like that happens here.

Re: Question about Good Omens show

[(Anonymous)]

SA/OP

Okay, that 'as long' shouldn't be there, should just say 'open to interpretation'.