case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-04-12 03:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #4846 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4846 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 49 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2020-04-12 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Partial agreement? I like “hero makes villain more heroic” way more than “villain makes hero more villainous,” but I don’t usually like seeing it rushed or easy. In Overwatch fandom, so many people wrote Widowmaker redemption that authors started to treat it as redundant—“I’m going to rush through the actual redemption part because you’re probably sick of reading about it.” And I feel like no, the redemption is still important to how the character turns out.

(I don’t think I’ve ever shipped two really messed-up characters together. I like Rocketshipping, but they’re both pretty goofy.)

(Anonymous) 2020-04-13 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Partial agreement? I like “hero makes villain more heroic” way more than “villain makes hero more villainous,” but I don’t usually like seeing it rushed or easy.

THIS. I have no interest in "fucked up ship is fucked up the end" and no interest in "villain makes hero more villainous," but a nice, long, twisty, complex "hero makes villain more heroic" story is my jam.