[ SECRET POST #4848 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4848 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Queer Eye]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Saint Seiya]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jonathan van Ness]


__________________________________________________



05.
[What We Do In The Shadows]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Pretear]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Eternal Love, aka Three Lives, Three Worlds, Ten Miles of Peach Blossoms]


__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't really care, but I wonder if this confuses (or just amuses) people whose native language DOES gender inanimate objects.

[(Anonymous)]

My language genders many inanimate objects. Grammatically speaking, we have three genders, male, female, and neuter (he, she, it), and objects can be either one of these. It's one of those things you just have to learn. This word is female, that word is neuter, this is another female, and that word is male. And deliberately using the wrong gender, the way he does, neither confuses nor amuses me, it mainly grates on my nerves. My English is solid enough that I can tell he's using the wrong word, and that he is doing it deliberately and not out of ignorance, so to me it reads like he's putting up a fake persona of cutesy-dumb. Others might feel differently, of course, but to me personally it makes him seem disingenuine.