[ SECRET POST #4850 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4850 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 17 secrets from Secret Submission Post #694.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yet how can you know what's wrong with the source material if you don't even bother to check it out for yourself?

And no, "because someone else said..." doesn't cut it.

[(Anonymous)]

That post was about why people would read fanfiction like that. But if anything, it seems easier to come up with reasons why someone might find it an interesting exercise to write fanfiction like that

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Nada. Ayrt was right, you can't accept or reject something without knowing what it is first. The post is about people using stereotypes as a moniker for established characters. Their response was towards people who apparently think that proper characterization isn't integral to writing.
Simply put, it isn't fanfiction if it isn't about a series or it's characters. Write original fiction if you want to exercise bland stereotypes, that's all.