[ SECRET POST #4895 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4895 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.



__________________________________________________



13.








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 66 secrets from Secret Submission Post #701.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I get your point, but that wasn't their goal. Every piece of artistic media that is created for entertainment could've been about a nobler cause, including all the books, TV shows and movies you enjoy. It seems like a peculiar complaint.

[philstar22]

But this wasn't just any piece of entertainment. This was reality tv made about real people who abuse real animals. Instead they vilainized the one person they featured who actually was trying to help the abused animals and in doing so harmed her business that helps abused animals. Rather than using their series about animal abusers to do some good they actively did the opposite.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, it was 100% a shitty thing to do, and you'll get no argument from me there. But my point stands. It makes just as much sense to get mad at McDonald's for selling shitty fast food burgers instead of just being a food pantry for the less privileged.

[(Anonymous)]

Shes just as bad tho and saying shes not is huge lie she profits of tigers and animals all the same but yes the abuse sucks but its not like you can really do anything about it and i dont support animal abuse i am glad its dying off as a trend i just think its crime drama tv something to watch

[philstar22]

No she's not. In the beginning she didn't know what she was doing and her and her charity did things the wrong way. Then they learned. Now they do it the right way and save animals. Anyone who says otherwise hasn't done the proper research and is buying into the lies of this show or the smear campaign against her.