[ SECRET POST #4917 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4917 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #704.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

For the record, even science fiction doesn't need to rigorously obey its own internal laws or the laws of the physical universe as we understand them, although it is pretty much necessary in hard SF. Much soft SF doesn't care about the physical plausibility of the events, and the stories don't suffer notably for it (although they might not be many peoples' cup of tea).

I would define science fiction as speculative fiction that deals artistically and imaginatively with the way that the human experience is and will be affected by technological change, how human beings will deal with technological development and deal with living in the future. And also, secondarily, as adventure stories about pew pew rocket ships. Neither of those things requires rigorous logical realism.