[ SECRET POST #4917 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4917 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #704.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

When was the last time you saw a homeless person? They weren't one ocean away. They weren't some giant, unsolvable problem. They were right there.

You could have changed their life by inviting them to live with you. You wouldn't even had needed to fight an entire city convinced that the homeless person needed to suffer in order to help them.

Did you do it?

No?

There you go.

[(Anonymous)]

Again, you miss the point. A lot of people don't do that because that's 1 homeless person out of 1,000,000 homeless people, and they don't feel that their contribution helps the overall problem.

If they went in knowing that taking in that one homeless person would end homelessness forever maybe they would take that poor child in.

However, this has nothing to do with my or your morality, or anyone's moral choices.

It's simply not a very good allegory when you're not comparing the same issues.

[(Anonymous)]

If they went in knowing that taking in that one homeless person would end homelessness forever maybe they would take that poor child in.

Why bother? They'd just replace the child. You can't take every single child in. It wouldn't help the overall problem.

And if you can't solve a problem completely, why bother do anything about it, am I right? Why help one person if you're not going to help them all?

[(Anonymous)]

Sigh. That's a deliberate misreading of my point and you know it is. I'm going to drop this thread here, as you've done that twice already.

[(Anonymous)]

You're the one deliberately misreading the point of an allegory that had been analyzed to death, but suit yourself!

[(Anonymous)]

DA

Or maybe it is just a bad allegory that doesn't actually work as a commentary on the real world.

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT You can just say you don't like it. It's a perfectly fine allegory, just not your taste. That's fine.

[(Anonymous)]

SA

It is a flat allegory, at least in my opinion, and in my opinion that makes it a bad allegory. In my opinion, it only works on a surface reading. There is no depth to it. Once you actually think about it there are all sorts of reasons why it doesn't work. The only way it works is if you just accept it. And personally that's not the way I read.

Yes, it is my opinion. It is my opinion that is bad writing.

[(Anonymous)]

So do nothing because it doesn't solve everything? Amazing choices, and one made by the people of Omelas all the time. If they free the child, well, then, everyone else suffers, so why bother!