case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-06-28 04:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #4923 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4923 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Legend of the White Snake]


__________________________________________________


03.
[Komi Can't Communicate]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Elm-Chanted Forest]


__________________________________________________



05.
(Lucifer, Supernatural)


__________________________________________________



06.
[Wheel of Time]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Queer Eye]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Criminal Minds]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 49 secrets from Secret Submission Post #705.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Controversial Opinions (Non-Fandom)

(Anonymous) 2020-06-29 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
I agree with your second point. Your first point isn't wrong, religious texts do allow for, and sometimes require, interpretation. However, both the bible and the quran both have many passages that espouse teachings and values that are overtly, unambiguously, "fundamentally inconsistent with Western liberalism." (Having read the majority of both of them, front to back, I would know.) Just because the entire text is not a cut-and-dried meaning packet, doesn't mean you can reasonably argue it is not quite clearly and demonstrably inconsistent with Western liberalism in certain places.

Re: Controversial Opinions (Non-Fandom)

(Anonymous) 2020-06-29 02:24 am (UTC)(link)
I accept that what you say is true by any reasonable, commonsense, everyday, straightforward reading of the texts in question. It is true for all secular intents and purposes.