case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-07-03 06:37 pm

[ SECRET POST #4928 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4928 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04. https://i.imgur.com/D25cLFc.png
[Emma 2020, OP warned for male nudity (from the back)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Wars Expanded Universe, resized]


__________________________________________________



06. https://i.imgur.com/R7v6vL6.png
[365 Days, OP warned for image of a dub/non-con sexual situation]


__________________________________________________
























07. [SPOILERS for Far Cry 5 and Far Cry New Dawn]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for The Magnus Archives]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #705.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-03 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Same, tbh.

People should be able to live as the gender they identify as, but at the same time ... women, biological women in this case specifically, shouldn't be denied penis-free spaces to pander to transwomen who are a tiny, tiny minority.

Especially as a fair few transwomen I follow are, uh ... keeping theirs and citing that you don't need dysphoria to be trans and they're are women but love their cocks.

That's cool, but I don't want it in a female-only space and that shouldn't be considered controversial.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-03 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Like you said, though--they're a tiny, tiny minority, and the ones you're so helpfully citing are an even smaller minority within that group, right?

There are a lot of things I don't want to see in a public dressing room, if I'm being honest, but it's fairly easy to avert my eyes. If someone is being aggressive about displaying their genitals, no matter what those genitals are, we already have laws for that, don't we?

And also you know that, like, in other countries, there are public multi-gender bathhouses, right?

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
"Penis-free spaces?" Seriously? If you're worried about sexual assault, not having a dick doesn't stop abusers who want to assault people, and I can't think of any "female space" where I had to drop my trousers or flash my tits or produce my pap smear results or whatever to come in, and I wouldn't want to go if there was.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
I'm a cis female and I would have zero problem with transgender women being part of any female-specific place I hung out in.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 02:43 am (UTC)(link)
My main issue with the dick-free spaces thing is that it perpetuates the myth that only people with dicks (who are most commonly men) can be abusers, which is an idea that needs to die already.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
Also makes me think...what do they think "male-only" spaces are like and shouldn't we be worried about vulnerable young boys and men in those spaces if they're so uniformly dangerous?

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 07:42 am (UTC)(link)
Congrats for wilfully ignoring the long, long history of men preying on women.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 01:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Good thing we have laws against predators in public spaces and both women and men have protections against that, then.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes because those work so well that women never get abused.

/ermmm

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Uh huh but trans women are not the ones getting through the law because they're all just malicious predators in disguise. The point is that the two concepts are entirely unrelated.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
This, too. Yes.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 07:39 am (UTC)(link)
They are the overwhelming majority, and "but female abusers exist!" is yet another way to denigrate women's experiences.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Fuck you, you selfish asshole. Sincerely, a cis woman whose most traumatizing abuse was all at the hands of another cis woman. She was a mom in my grade school PTA who was friends with my mom, and it started when I hit puberty and the stalking continued into my early 30s.

The number of people who didn't believe me because women don't tell teen girls "I'm naked under this bathrobe" when they pick you up after school, or put their hands down your pants when you're in your 20s, or text you at 2 am randomly for years, because "women don't do that," included my own mother, who survived being assaulted by her dad up through her 20s, but didn't understand how what happened to me could be traumatizing, since there was no penis or genitals involved and "she has a son, she's not gay, she doesn't mean it like that."

I wasn't gay either, I was asexual, and also 11 when she started. Fuck off with your "denigrating women's experiences" dismissive bullshit, you abuse apologist.

(Anonymous) 2020-07-05 06:24 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you. This needs to be said more often

(Anonymous) 2020-07-04 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
Can you give me one-- one-- example of a situation where a woman having a penis would have any bearing whatsoever on the situation? Like, if you're gonna say changing rooms or whatever, just... don't look at people's genitals?