[ SECRET POST #4928 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4928 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04. https://i.imgur.com/D25cLFc.png
[Emma 2020, OP warned for male nudity (from the back)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Star Wars Expanded Universe, resized]


__________________________________________________



06. https://i.imgur.com/R7v6vL6.png
[365 Days, OP warned for image of a dub/non-con sexual situation]


__________________________________________________
























07. [SPOILERS for Far Cry 5 and Far Cry New Dawn]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for The Magnus Archives]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for sexual assault]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #705.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Ah, the Guardian, definitely not biased in their picks of who to interview :) But actually, no, I don't find it depressing to question not being a girl because you don't like girly things? After all, it is very common for people who aren't girls not to like girly things! It's also very common for girls not to, which the great thing about that is, those girls can also question and examine their gender and conclude that despite not liking girly things, they are in fact girls! And nonbinary people can use not liking girly things as a starting point to examine their gender and conclude that they're not! Isn't it beautiful that people who get both results can coexist?

[(Anonymous)]

Can you blame people for coming to those conclusions when most of the folks who claim to be enbies posted pics of themselves in "boy" mode and "girl" mode during non-binary visibility day. It's, like, wow, you like to wear makeup and skirts one day and flannels and scruffy hair on others. If you're female, congrats you're like a majority of women living in the Western world.

[(Anonymous)]

You're like, big mad about nonbinary people existing, aren't you?

[(Anonymous)]

Not seeing it.

[(Anonymous)]

Of course they aren't. But you seem very invested in the fact that no-one can disagree with you otherwise.

[(Anonymous)]

Ah yes my one-sentence commentary is more investment than a paragraph's worth of policing the way other people dress.

[(Anonymous)]

There was a similar article linked by BuzzFeed recently (I don't have the link to hand, sorry).

One transboy said he wanted to transition because boys could be strong. That broke my heart a little.

[(Anonymous)]

Really speaks more to societal issues than trans ones, doesn't it? Cisheteronormative patterns put soooo much pressure on everyone from literally the day they're born to conform one way or another.