[ SECRET POST #4935 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4935 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________

















03. [SPOILERS for Hogwarts school of prayer and miracles]



__________________________________________________



04. [SPOILERS for Dark]



__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Higurashi no Naku Koro Ni]
[WARNING for discussion of eating disorders]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of underage noncon]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia, bullying]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #706.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

It's a few things:
One, scope. JK Rowling has way more influence. A huge franchise. 14 million twitter followers.
Two, the types of influence. JK Rowling wrote a series for children/young adults.
Three, how the attitudes are expressed. JK Rowling remained under the radar until she ramped up her transphobic attitudes. Meanwhile, Rice has been considered pretty shitty for a while.

[(Anonymous)]

OK fine jk Rowling is the only rich person ever to be bad.

[(Anonymous)]

That's NOT what I'm saying. I'm saying that she's very dangerous because of her influence and that people are right to be mad. Using arguments like "other rich people are bad too" doesn't mean we should ignore what she's doing

[(Anonymous)]

Not even ignoring what she is doing - just pissed off at the whole mentality that if you like something (Harry Potter) while the author has done or is currently being problematic then therefore you're essentially supporting the author, even when you're against that author's views.