case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-08-16 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #4972 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4972 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #712.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: To you, what is necessary for a same-sex relationship to be considered canon?

(Anonymous) 2020-08-16 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
As far as i'm concerned, there is no basis for The Untamed to be considered not a canon relationship for one very clear reason which is the note from the producers at the very end.

'Thanks to (the author) for creating these characters. May their wishes come true ever after.'

The wishes of the characters were to get married and have sex every day. So pretty sure that's as clear as they could make it.

Re: To you, what is necessary for a same-sex relationship to be considered canon?

(Anonymous) 2020-08-16 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

Frankly, I've yet to hear an argument for The Untamed not being gay enough that comes from a reasonable person. It's usually someone who's mad about the lack of explicit sexual content and/or upset that nobody is willing to break the law and go to jail in order to provide them with m/m content.

+2

(Anonymous) 2020-08-17 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
I agree.