case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-08-17 05:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #4973 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4973 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #712.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-08-17 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
You are being unfair OP and smidge elitist. Austin's books were popular novels during her time. Just like popular books today are written with a language that is easy for us to understand with little references to things we recognize or events that we know so were her books. It makes the reader feel more engaged and it did then too. But calling out readers for not getting all the inside jokes isn't right. It can't be hard to understand if you don't know the time period and all the little inside jokes. It would be like me judging you for not understanding Beowulf in middle english.

BTW I adore Austen, the Brontes, and even Beowulf in middle english for what little I can translate. Useless English Lit degrees UNITE!