[ SECRET POST #4979 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4979 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Jurassic Park]


__________________________________________________


03.
[Jeon Somi]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Wynonna Earp]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Untamed]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Brian Molko of Placebo + Jay Leno = Noel Fielding]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Untamed]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #713.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Tagging etiquette!

[(Anonymous)]

I think it tends to vary with the nature of the tag. AO3 archive warnings, for example, are there to warn potential readers, with the convenient side effect of attracting other readers, and the same can usually be said of other tags for disturbing content. Tags such as ships, a number of kinks, a number of specific sex acts, etc. on the other hand are usually used to attract readers, with the convenient side effect of warning off readers who really hate that content.

Both types are a courtesy and not a necessity - CNTW is always a valid tag - but in general, tags to warn merit more liberal use because 100 words of graphic eye torture in a 10,000 word fic could still ruin someone's day, while someone who clicks on a fic tagged with, say, Harry/Ron would quite reasonably be annoyed if they only showed up for 100 words in a 10,000 word story, or were only mentioned in as a past relationship in a Harry/Krum story.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

I agree, with this completely.