[ SECRET POST #4982 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4982 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #713.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I don't care whether something is historically accurate or not, as long as the author is aware of what they're writing - jolly gay Regency romp with a big gay society wedding? Fine! Depressingly accurate romance that reminds us that the heroine is now the property of the hero? Also fine! What I don't like is someone pointing out all the research they've done and it's flagrantly wrong.

[(Anonymous)]

agreed. i couldn't give a rat's ass about historical accuracy so long as the author stays true to the story they're telling.

[(Anonymous)]

OP

Yeah that's fair enough. Going to set those expectations low, don't worry.
There's a crime fiction book (I think it was Roadside Crosses by Jeffery Deaver) where the author really condescendingly explains how the internet works in every chapter but the explanation is very old dude who did one intro to computers course in the 90s. I got stuck on a plane with that book and it left an impression.