case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2008-12-18 04:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #713 ]


⌈ Secret Post #713 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

101.
[X/1999]


__________________________________________________



102.


__________________________________________________



103.
[NEWS, Koyama]


__________________________________________________



104.
[Ojiichan wa Shounen Tantei]


__________________________________________________



105. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



106.
[Stephen King's IT]


__________________________________________________



107. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



108. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



109. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



110.


__________________________________________________



111.


__________________________________________________



112.
[LJ, Fanfiction.net, y!gallery, devart]


__________________________________________________



113.


__________________________________________________



114.


__________________________________________________



115.


__________________________________________________



116.


__________________________________________________



117.
[FFXII]


__________________________________________________



118.
[Goof Troop]


__________________________________________________



119.
[Toradora!]


__________________________________________________



120.


__________________________________________________



121.


__________________________________________________



122.
[Heroes/The 4400]


__________________________________________________



123.
[The Submarines]


__________________________________________________



124.


__________________________________________________



125.


__________________________________________________



126.


__________________________________________________



127.
[Merlin]


__________________________________________________



128.


__________________________________________________



129.


__________________________________________________



130.


__________________________________________________



131.


__________________________________________________



132.
[jesse lacey (brand new); chris conley (saves the day); andrew mcmahon (jack's mannequin/something corporate); max bemis (say/anything); anthony green (circa survive); craig owens (chiodos/cinematic sunrise)]


__________________________________________________



133.
[father of the pride]


__________________________________________________



134.
[Kuroshitsuji]


__________________________________________________



135.


__________________________________________________



136.


__________________________________________________



137.


__________________________________________________



138.
[Katekyo Hitman Reborn, Dr Who, Pirates of the Caribbean]


__________________________________________________



139.


__________________________________________________



140.


__________________________________________________



141.
[Schindler's List]


__________________________________________________



142.
[Metal Gear Solid]


__________________________________________________



143.
[Prince of Tennis]


__________________________________________________



144.
[John Oliver]


__________________________________________________



145.
[Crossing Jordan]


__________________________________________________



146.
[madeline]


__________________________________________________



147.
[Gunnerkrigg Court]


__________________________________________________



148.
[FFVII Crisis Core]


__________________________________________________



149.


__________________________________________________



150.


__________________________________________________



151.
[Dr Who]


__________________________________________________



152.


__________________________________________________



153.


__________________________________________________



154. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



155.
[Emberverse]


__________________________________________________



156.


__________________________________________________



157.


__________________________________________________



158.


__________________________________________________



159.
[It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia]


__________________________________________________



160.


__________________________________________________



161.


__________________________________________________



162.
[Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory]


__________________________________________________



163.
[World of Warcraft]


__________________________________________________



164.
[Hey Arnold]


__________________________________________________



165.
[Kamen Rider Kiva / Dexter]


__________________________________________________



166.
[Monk]


__________________________________________________



167.


__________________________________________________



168.


__________________________________________________



169.


__________________________________________________



170.
[Meat Loaf]


__________________________________________________



171.


__________________________________________________



172.


__________________________________________________



173.
[Video Girl Ai]


__________________________________________________



174.
[Ferris Bueller's Day Off]


__________________________________________________



175.
[Voice actors (Chris Patton, Crispin Freeman, Yuri Lowenthal, Johnny Yong Bosch, Jeff Nimoy, Travis Willingham, Quinton Flynn, Kyle Hebert, Jamie McGonnigal)]



Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #102.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 - too big ], [ 1 2 3 4 5 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] elmathelas.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Is it just that he looks douchey, or is there a douchebaggy story to go with this picture?

158

(Anonymous) 2008-12-19 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
He just looks douchey as far as I know. But honestly, this picture was supposed to have remained private (or as private as something can be on the internet, anyway). It was originally somewhere on someone's personal myspace and then it got leaked all over the place. So I don't think it was anything more than just him screwing around with his cast mates.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] plainjanejones0.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, i don't know the story behind it. It just seems like a douchebag thing to do. Look at all you wimps, who may only wear a t-shirt to be as amazing as I! Be in AWE! or something. Like he is mocking them.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] fromyourashes.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
Do you have friends? Do you ever do really stupid shit with them? Sure, these aren't his close friends, but they were working on a movie, and it was a difficult shoot. They're guys, and guys are dorks, and they were punchy and tired and likely just fucking around. I don't get how that makes him douchey. Dorky, sure, and possibly insecure about himself, but douchey? *shrugs*

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] plainjanejones0.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
Sure I have friends. But I'd never get a group of fat ones together and have them wear t-shirts of hot female bodies in bikinis while I pose all slender and pretty. Because that would be mocking them. It would be a douchebag thing to do.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] fromyourashes.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 04:17 am (UTC)(link)
LMAO, it surely would.

...I am realllly pretty sure that I don't see what that has to do with that picture, but I totally agree with you, in that getting a shitload of fat people together and doing that to them would be a douchbaggy mockery of their fatness.

Anyway, like I was asking...have you ever done something really stupid with your friends while overtired and overworked? And if so, try to imagine someone who wasn't there seeing a snapshot of that moment and jumping to conclusions when they don't know what's going on. This picture we're talking about...do you think Jared went and bought those t-shirts and asked people to wear them so that he could pose? Don't you think it's more likely that someone on the crew picked them up, perhaps as a joke along the lines of, "Look, we can be buff like Jared," just to fuck with him, and during one of those moments between takes where everyone's just trying to stay awake and not get pissy because they're tired and bitchy, someone decided to put on the shirts and take a picture?

(although, hey, to be fair, you could be totally right. I wasn't there.)

Sorry, lol, I just don't see it as douchey. I just see a bunch of dudes being dorky, maybe corny as hell. But when I think douche, the last name that comes to mind is Jared Padalecki.

I've said "douche" too many freakin' times already tonight.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] plainjanejones0.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 04:33 am (UTC)(link)
I am realllly pretty sure that I don't see what that has to do with that picture

It's a parallel: a picture of a fit man posing with a bunch of unfit men while they wear shirts to look like him vs a picture of a fit woman posing with a bunch of unfit women while they wear shirts to look like her. I am really pretty sure that I don't see how it's unclear.

No, I've never done anything like this. I can say that with certainty. I don't like mocking and/or making fun of my friends. Or acquiantances. Complete strangers. That is absolutely not the kind of person I am.

I have no idea the story behind the picture. It's entirely possible that it wasn't Jared's idea. But if you look at all of the men in the photo, there are a couple who don't look very amused by being mocked.

That's fine if you don't see it the way I do. You don't have to. But I still think it's a douchebag (or jackass, if you prefer) thing to do.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] fromyourashes.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
I guess I don't see it because I don't think all of those men are unfit. They work crew on a big movie set - which means that even if they aren't half naked and flexing their shit, they're still in shape. The work they do is difficult, so I'm sorry, I don't see a parallel...but I'll admit that if I did think they were all fat, and they weren't smiling and they didn't all look like they were having a good ol' time, I could completely see where you were coming from. If all that was what I saw.

But if you look at all of the men in the photo, there are a couple who don't look very amused by being mocked.

Those are grown ass men, and I'm sorry, but I don't see anyone holding a gun to their heads. If they didn't wanna be in the picture, lmao, they wouldn't. You're seeing something no one else is seeing, and I'm sorry you have such a negative outlook. Agree to disagree, though, and all that, so happy holidays!

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] plainjanejones0.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
The guy in the plaid shorts, for one example, is clearly over weight.

I'm sorry you have such a negative outlook.

Save your sympathy for your own stupid assumption. Just because I don't like this photo I have to have a negative outlook? Do you always go around judging people based on one extremely insignificant opinion they hold? I guess I only have to go search how many times your name appears over in the wank report to find the answer to that question.

How about I give you a snap judgement in return? You sound like the kind of person who does jerk off things to their friends and then uses the old standby "Oh, come on! It was just a JOKE!" when not everyone is amused by it. Pretty sure the wank report would back me up on that one, too.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] fromyourashes.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
First of all, wayyyy too serious for F!S. I was trying to show you that it's possible that he wasn't being a douche, you were steadfast in being negative, therefore it seemed clear to me that in regards to this (ridiculous) secret, your outlook was negative. My bad that you needed me to clarify it for you.

Secondly, do it now, go on a search. When was the last time my name appeared on anything? No, really, go do it.

You sound like the kind of person who does jerk off things to their friends and then uses the old standby "Oh, come on! It was just a JOKE!" when not everyone is amused by it. Pretty sure the wank report would back me up on that one, too.

You brought it up, why not get specific? Because you have me at a disadvantage, since I don't know who the hell you are, and if you're gonna bring up old shit, at least clarify it for everyone involved, because I'm fairly certain I've never said anything about just joking in regards to wank with my "friends". Anyone I ever had any kind of online wank with was never any friend of mine.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] plainjanejones0.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 05:15 am (UTC)(link)
First of all, wayyyy too serious for F!S.

Oh clearly as it seems to be so important to you to turn my opinion of a random B-lister around!

I have no idea when you were last mentioned. Having been in fandom for many years, I have simply seen your behavior reported there several times for ridiculous crap in the SPN fandom. You probably take lots of things in your life too seriously (like my low opinion of your tv crush, who could probably care less) and likely have anger issues, as evidenced by the many poorly thought out rants you've publicly posted in your journal, complete with vile name calling and threats of internet violence.

Oh goody! I didn't know I would get to be an internet/armchair anything today. Thanks for turning my day brighter. See? My outlook is turning positive already.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] fromyourashes.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
Oh clearly as it seems to be so important to you to turn my opinion of a random B-lister around!

I wasn't expecting to change your opinion of him around, because if you think he's a douche, so be it. Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. I was trying to understand what about that picture gave you the opinion, and you're right, there was little reason to spend time on that.

In regards to the other nonsense, I half expected you to actually know what you were talking about. You don't, you know nothing about me other than bits and pieces about things from the past that have no relevance today, and that's that. People grow up, and I'm not about to apologize or try to explain to someone like you. There was never any need to get personal at all, but it gave you some happiness, so I'm glad I could help you out there.

Again, happy holidays, sunshine.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] plainjanejones0.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 05:38 am (UTC)(link)
You're the one who made it personal right from the start, by suggesting that I must not have any friends, then following it up with the comment about my outlook. You also seem to have a problem taking what you dish out. Not surprising.

you know nothing about me other than bits and pieces about things from the past

*snort* Please, that's like saying the wank report isn't a reliable source to show that ckll is a crazy ass. Positive growth is important, though, so good luck with that. And no, I don't mean that in the passive-aggressive happy holidays, sunshine way that you like to say things.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] fromyourashes.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 06:28 am (UTC)(link)
You're the one who made it personal right from the start, by suggesting that I must not have any friends, then following it up with the comment about my outlook. You also seem to have a problem taking what you dish out. Not surprising.

...you took it as my suggesting that you didn't have any friends, but that wasn't my point at all. I can see how you could have misconstrued my meaning, because it's difficult to read between the lines when something isn't made clear to begin with, but I figured that by the next couple of comments, when I tried to show that people do stupid things with their friends that others might not understand...LOL, nevermind. You'll either see what I mean or you won't, I'm done with this. It's late, and this is pointless, and I'm being an asshole by replying again, anyway.

Either way, I wasn't dishing out anything or attempting to make it personal, whether you took it that way or not, and whatever it was you supposedly dished back to me wasn't a problem. I asked you what you were talking about, you told me what that was, and I said you didn't know me. Pretty clear cut, and the only thing I didn't like was that you got personal, and brought up things just to be hurtful or bitchy or for whatever reasons you have. It was unnecessary and tacky, so if that's what you mean by saying I can't handle what you dished out, then...sure. It was obviously eating you up, since you threw it out there like that, and I'm glad you got it out of your system, and hope you're over it, because neither of us are any of the other's business.

I won't be passive-aggressive, though. I genuinely hope that your holiday season is just as good as you deserve. Take that as it's meant, because you're either a nice person in the real world and deserve to have a nice, relaxing holiday, or you're just as douchey as you are here. I don't know, considering I only have some internet comments to go by, so I'll just assume you're a decent person and hope for the best.

Good night.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] riveryklown.livejournal.com 2008-12-19 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you always go around judging people based on one extremely insignificant opinion they hold?

OMD You're kidding me right?? You DO realize that's just what you're doing with this pic????

This is awesome :) And also, I won't be continuing this wank, just pointing out your hypocrisy.
Aloha.

Re: 140, 158

[identity profile] plainjanejones0.livejournal.com 2008-12-24 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
No. A photograph is not an opinion.