case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-09-08 05:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #4995 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4995 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #715.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-08 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know but I want to place a bet that it's just seme/uke

(Anonymous) 2020-09-08 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Probably this but with some self lubricating assholes and mpreg thrown in.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-08 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Those aren't really homophobic stereotypes

A-are they

(Anonymous) 2020-09-08 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Weepy feminine cum-slut size-queen uke and stoic rough unfeeling manly seme certainly are.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-08 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, yeah, I meant the mpreg and self-lubricating assholes parts.

Like people aren't out there cursing about how all the damn gay cis men are getting pregnant constantly or anything

(Anonymous) 2020-09-08 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Not strictly no, but they are extreme female attributes being given to the stereotype bottom. Like the culmination of that stereotype.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-08 10:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that's a stretch. Like obviously there are elements of that with the mpreg piece, but it's definitely not the only thing that's going on there. IDK

(Anonymous) 2020-09-09 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
"a stretch"

Oh, but this is entirely the point with a size queen, isn't it?

(Anonymous) 2020-09-09 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
Because there's nothing worse than an effeminate man, obviously.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-09 10:04 am (UTC)(link)
Of course not, but when that's the only way the "receiving" partner is portrayed, it becomes a problem in general. Individual real people are different.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-09 01:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Or maybe we shouldn't shame people, who are always on the receiving end in real life, for how they want to portray people like themselves in fiction?

(Anonymous) 2020-09-09 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Wait, are you saying that straight women write most of this kind of porn, so it's okay that they're making gay men more like themselves? Or are you saying that effeminate gay men are writing most of it so it's a self-expression?

I'm honestly confused by your argument here.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-09 12:20 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT Of course there's nothing wrong with effeminate men. The OP asked about stereotypes and effeminate bottom is the one under discussion.

(Anonymous) 2020-09-09 01:36 pm (UTC)(link)
And I'm arguing that there's nothing inherently wrong with that. Looking for realism and empowerment in porn is not the smartest idea.