Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-09-19 04:29 pm
[ SECRET POST #5006 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5006 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 62 secrets from Secret Submission Post #717.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-19 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)People showed photos of the 86 Sears catalog to claim that's what girls were really wearing. Uh, there's a reason late 20thC Sears was not known as a fashionable place to get clothes... Personally, when we could shop at a department store and I was allowed to pick out my own clothes, I wouldn't have been caught dead in the stuff seen in Sears.
Someone showed a photo of Rudy Huxtable, basically saying "this is what the doll should be dressed like". Forgetting that these two characters live in two very different worlds. One is a middle class Valley Girl, the other is the sheltered daughter of rich parents in Brooklyn.
no subject
I wasn’t much more stylish, but those collars were the worst.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-20 12:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-19 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-19 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-19 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-19 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)Although, to be fair, I don't think the Care Bears ever dealt with it. Demonic possession of lonely children, yes. Mutually Assured Destruction -- not so much.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-19 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-20 12:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-20 12:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-20 06:14 am (UTC)(link)I also remember another one where the Care Bears interacted with these kids at a camp.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-20 03:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
We had to read "Z for Zachariah" and "Brother in the Land" at primary school (age 10 or 11), and the subject definitely came up before then. Heck, someone gave me, aged five or so, a picture book called "One Hundred Reasons Not To Have A Nuclear War. We didn't have duck and cover drills, though - I suspect our teachers would have viewed it as pointless...
Luckily, I was just too young to miss the trend for showing teenagers "Threads," which has to be one of the most traumatising TV dramas ever. (It's up on youTube, but I take no responsibilities for any nightmares).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-09-20 03:13 am (UTC)(link)A kid wouldn't really have a nuanced understanding of either topic (hell, most adults didn't and still don't have a particularly nuanced understanding of either topic), but they'd be broad-strokes aware.