case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-09-30 06:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #5017 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5017 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #718.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-01 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
i think the reason it is seen as negative is because "appropriation" implies the original culture no longer has any right to it, or that it is misrepresented. that is why the the term "cultural appropriation" is so contentuous.

you can have a person not of the nationality that comes to learn of another culture, and adopts its customs and beliefs out of love, to the point he even moves because the country might be either friendly or more prosperous than his own. In there, the culture appropriates him, not the other way around.

then you have disney trying to copyright dia de muertos from mexicans. they tried to appropriate the culture. it is the only case i know where i would use the term "culture appropriation" the way most people understand it.

other than that, ngl, i really dislike the term for its negative connotations. sometimes one wants others to know of their culture. it doesn't mean it's harming us, ffs.