case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-10-04 03:22 pm

[ SECRET POST #5021 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5021 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 57 secrets from Secret Submission Post #719.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2020-10-04 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure if this is what the secret maker meant or not, but people speak as if chemistry is objective. As if characters objectively have chemistry or don't. That's not how it works. I may see chemistry in a pair you think don't have any at all, and vice versa.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-04 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh. Both the examples op mentioned in the secret sounds like people who are talking about their own opinion on whether or not they see chemistry between two people. If you read both sentences, the "to me" is strongly implied.