case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-10-19 06:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #5036 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5036 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 34 secrets from Secret Submission Post #721.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-20 07:57 am (UTC)(link)
Don't be disingenuous. Male writers do this all the time, along with the "woman who is a blow up doll" trope, and pointing this out is not misogynist.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-20 10:37 am (UTC)(link)
Don't be sexist. A human being portrayed like an object is unrealistic and wrong. A human being portrayed as acting in a non-stereotypical way is a great thing. It strikes you as odd because you're used to women being stereotypically feminine. Or perhaps you're stereotypically feminine yourself and you find that personally relatable, and you can't compreghend the fact that butch women find something else ralatable.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-20 12:44 pm (UTC)(link)
You're the sexist. And ignorant too. You shouldn't comment on characters in books if the last book you read was Harry Potter

(Anonymous) 2020-10-20 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, nah. Just because you hate women who are insufficiently feminine for your tastes doesn't mean those women are "essentially men".