case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-10-25 04:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #5042 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5042 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #722.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-27 06:52 am (UTC)(link)
How about we just don't do facile criticism based on an ignorant guess of what we think the author's identity might be? If we don't do that, then it won't force authors to come out, in situations where they might be unsafe, just to defend their work and their lives and their "right" to write a fictional story.

meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2020-10-28 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
while considering that I don't think that it's force in such a situation since I don't think that's a great way to confront criticism, and considering that like "i hate men" it's very much possible to understand the social underpinnings of statements go beyond a literal reading, I can't agree.

(Anonymous) 2020-10-29 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
Different anon. Uh no. "I hate men", or any other vague, vast group, is always a bigoted statement. Doesn't matter if the person means it literally or not.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2020-10-29 10:50 am (UTC)(link)
lol