case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-12-03 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #5081 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5081 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 13 secrets from Secret Submission Post #727.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-12-04 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't read this specific book, but generally, the way this stuff works in Holmes fandom is that you write from the conceit that Holmes and Watson were literally real people and that Watson wrote down the actual adventures of himself and Holmes and then sent them in to Arthur Conan Doyle to publish them. And then you go through the stories and you try to explain where and when they happened In Real Life, and you explain away both the contradictions in the canon, and the contradictions between the stories and reality.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2020-12-04 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
Okay.
I...guess I don't really get why that sucks, other than if the author isn't any good.

(Anonymous) 2020-12-04 06:53 am (UTC)(link)
That's interesting.