case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2020-12-05 03:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #5083 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5083 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #728.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2020-12-05 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I blame Philippa Gregory (the author of the books that series was based on), she's got some huge hang-ups about evil scheming women and likes interpreting many female historical figures that way. Anne Boleyn is the most obvious one. Gregory thinks she's a historian or something, and doesn't seem to understand she's writing War of the Roses/Tudor fanfiction.
sparklywalls: (Default)

[personal profile] sparklywalls 2020-12-05 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Historical fiction is fine but the belief that you're telling some unspoken truth while writing it is just URGH. Also her idea that strong female = scheming (and that's their defining characteristic) just really doesn't speak to me. At all. It's just...that's not really an improvement on female characters or historical women in general being an ornament?