[ SECRET POST #5085 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5085 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #728.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I’ve seen this opinion expressed several times and I never know whether I agree with it or not.

I embrace fanon characterizations. Fanon characterizations are great… Up to a point.

-I’ll take a messy, profoundly repressed Sherlock over a genuinely sociopathic Sherlock any day.

-Give me a Draco Malfoy who was a hateful little prick because it’s what his father taught him, and he wanted to be just like his father, but once he finally sees the error of his ways he admits what a horrible little cretin he always was, and accepts that others are in their rights to hate him and shun him.

-Give me a Fox Mulder who appreciated Scully more, and is less of a petulant child.

-Give me a Peter Parker who is a bit more contemplative and a bit less reckless.

I usually prefer fanon characterizations to canon ones. HOWEVER, plenty of fanon gets way too OOC for my personal liking. There’s the kind of fanon characterization that’s like canon but even better. And then there’s the kind of fanon characterization where the character starts to become unrecognizable. I love the former; I’ll pass on the latter.