[ SECRET POST #5112 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5112 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #732.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: CGI or traditional effects?

[(Anonymous)]

When CGI is used right it can be good (like in the Lord of the Rings trilogy) - but I think more often than not it gets over used to a point where a lot of the affects gets lost in itself and makes a pretty forgettable impression on the audience.

Whereas traditional effects can be amazing, of course depending on quality/budget - but for instance the animatronics & puppetry in films like Jurassic Park and Gremlins are just more memorable and part of the movie's world.

Re: CGI or traditional effects?

[(Anonymous)]

The last time I saw Jurassic Park a few years ago, I thought the occasional cgi used held up fairly well - but did think it probably won’t age as well as the animatronics.