[ SECRET POST #5112 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5112 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 39 secrets from Secret Submission Post #732.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: CGI or traditional effects?

[(Anonymous)]

Eh, for me CGI looks too smooth and fake even when done well.

Re: CGI or traditional effects?

[(Anonymous)]

I bet you watch movies with A LOT of good CGI but don't even realize it.

Re: CGI or traditional effects?

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT

For sure! It's one of those unfortunate visual arts callings where, if you're doing your job well, no one notices.

Re: CGI or traditional effects?

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT Maybe, and if so kudos to them. I still prefer traditional.

Re: CGI or traditional effects?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't go to the movies so I've been watching movies on my old 36" tv (it was largescreen when we bought it in 2010 and now it's "old" and "small") for many years. just got a 55", watched some movies from the last 10 years. holy shit can you tell CGI easily. like. seriously, technology has made it to where it's all too obvious that all the backgrounds and blurry action shots are CGI and now I'm genuinely disappointed. I expected more good matte paintings or live backgrounds but apparently not.