case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-01-05 04:29 pm

[ SECRET POST #5114 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5114 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #732.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
I think people just love shitting on Neil Gaiman. I met him once and he seemed like a lovely guy, very kind & genuine. I'm sure I wouldn't fare much better than him under decades of public scrutiny, & most of the people upthread probably wouldn't either.

But, as they say, haters gonna hate.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
His pretentious and his writing is shit. Two valid reasons not to like him.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 03:47 am (UTC)(link)
And yet, we're dedicating a whole thread to blowing a comment about quarters out of proportion. Seems lazy, if there are so many legitimate complaints.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
DA - All I see here is some belligerent loudmouth (that's you) stating their opinions like facts. Which is giving me reasons not to like you, but tells me basically nothing about NG.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 07:52 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT I quantify my opinions with 'two valid reasons to hate him' - thus making it clear they are my opinions. It's people like you who make him even more hateable. Never could stand rabid fan culture.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 05:14 am (UTC)(link)
His writing is clearly not shit if the context of the complaint is that he's made several millions from it.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
Michael Crichton's made millions from his writing, too. Dan Brown has made millions from his writing.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 05:40 am (UTC)(link)
I think they're both extremely good at what they do, anon. May not be your cuppa but as published writers those people are at the top of the game.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
That's just pedantic.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 05:42 am (UTC)(link)
Or maybe "his writing is shit" is a subjective statement that can't be quantified? Who's to say.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
Of course it's a subjective statement. It's obviously a subjective statement. So much so that, when someone says "Neil Gaiman's writing is shit", it should be understood by all reasonable people that they're sharing a subjective opinion.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
Haha, but is that what you think you are? A reasonable person?

I think any reasonable person would aspire to be as "shitty" a writer as Harvard-educated, worldwide bestselling Michael Crichton with his fingers in some of the most popular and celebrated media properties in existence, but we obviously disagree on that.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT If I worked my ass off and was able to write as well as Michael Crichton as a result I would be pleased. If I ended up being able to write like NG then I would be disappointed, as his writing is everything I despise about geek culture. Not from a technically proficient pov, but in terms of everything else.

If I could write as well as Terry Pratchett, now that is the dream.

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 09:37 am (UTC)(link)
da-

i tried picking up american gods and it was exactly the kind of self absorbed dude bullshit i hate. i was baffled that it's popular with people i admire. maybe it gets good after chapter 5 but i'll never know because i got tired reading about nipples

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

'self absorbed dude bullshit' is the perfect description of his writing and exactly why I hate it.
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)

Re: THANK YOU.

[personal profile] tree_and_leaf 2021-01-06 10:28 am (UTC)(link)
It's hugely unfair to Michael Crichton to put him in the same bracket as Dan Brown, IMO (whose books really are badly-written trash, although well done him for identifying a lucrative and appealing subject area, I guess).

Re: THANK YOU.

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 07:53 am (UTC)(link)
+1

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2021-01-06 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Did I say you couldn't dislike him, or at least dislike his writing?

I was just commenting on all the bad faith arguments, as in the OP's. Like there's always a group of people who want to interpret everything he says in the worst possible way & I think it's kinda pathetic.

(I know this happens with a lot of famous and famous-ish people online.. I think that's pathetic too, for the record)