case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-03-12 07:33 pm

[ SECRET POST #5180 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5180 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________






















06. [SPOILERS for Brand upon the Brain!]
[WARNING for mention of suicide]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for End Roll]
[WARNING for mention of suicide]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for probable discussion of sexual assault?]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for mention of sexual assault/rape]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of rape?]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for mention of sexual harassment]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for mention of domestic violence]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #741.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-03-13 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Harry's child/ren are out of the direct line of succession, but iirc they will become princes and princesses when the Queen dies, and they're then grandchildren or niblings of the next monarch. Thus we get Prince Michael of Kent, also not in the direct line of succession.

Would they want titles for the kids? Anne's don't have titles, from memory. Andrew's did, but he was very hung up on being second in line to the throne and we know where that went.

It's archaic and convoluted but that's what you get when you marry into the royal family.

As for the royal family not protecting Harry's mother, she turned down protection from what I remember? It's been a while.
dantesspirit: (Default)

[personal profile] dantesspirit 2021-03-15 05:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Princess Anne's two kids, Zara and Phillip, don't have titles *because she refused them*, not because they were never offered.

Prince Andrew's daughters are titled, because he and Fergie didn't refuse them when offered. But they are also not high up in the ranking as far as the crown goes either.

Typically, the grandchildren of the monarch *are* titled, unless the parents refuse the titles.

So yes, Archie should have been a prince in his own right. He is still in direct line- Harry is still 6th in line, making Archie 7th.

And yes, if I remember correctly, once the divorce was finalized, Diana turned down extensive protection that she would have had , had they remained married.