[ SECRET POST #5180 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5180 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________






















06. [SPOILERS for Brand upon the Brain!]
[WARNING for mention of suicide]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for End Roll]
[WARNING for mention of suicide]



__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for probable discussion of sexual assault?]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for mention of sexual assault/rape]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of rape?]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for mention of sexual harassment]



__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for mention of domestic violence]



__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #741.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, you're one of those "woman can do no wrong" people. He's no angel, but she was the abuser in that relationship.

[(Anonymous)]

This. I was pretty sure she was telling the truth - until I saw some of the evidence he presented. The evidence was enough to change my mind. I agree they're both awful, but this IS a case of a man being a DV victim. There's no longer any doubt that she was the worse abuser here, IMO.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh my god, you're really falling for Johnny Depp and his team's propaganda huh. A whole bunch of shit pulled out of context.

Google "reactive abuse" please.

Was she the actual abuser? No. You can tell just by checking WHO is continuing to drag this out in the courts (hint: it's Johnny Depp) which is a classic abuser thing: to continue to hound their victim to never let them get any peace even after they manage to escape.

Also, the dude lost a case against The Sun who called him a wife beater, which means the Sun was actually correct in calling him a wife beater. So. You know. That should tell you something.

There's also his absolutely HORRIFIC set of texts with Paul Bettany, where he says they should drown her and then burn her and fuck her corpse. You know, definitely something an abuse victim would say about their abuser and not the other way round.

But I also know that you people don't care about the actual facts so whatever

[(Anonymous)]

Ah yes, the facts, like her having an actual history of abusing her ex?
I do believe they abused each other. But she's just as much of a shitstain as he is.

[(Anonymous)]

Depp losing the case against The Sun didn't 'prove' he's a wife beater. It only proved that calling someone a wife beater isn't libel slander or defamation, because it's an opinion. Tabloids know to always phrase things so they can be as attention-grabbing as possible, without actually accusing anyone of a crime. That's where the legal trouble would actually start.

I think Depp is just as much of a POS as Heard, but you're making your case look ridiculous by claiming a failed defamation case automatically means the accusations are true. That's not how that works.

[(Anonymous)]

............ You think the case proved that calling someone a "wife beater" is an opinion? Are you serious?

"Mr Depp, 57, sued the paper after it claimed he assaulted his ex-wife Amber Heard, which he denies. The Sun said the article was accurate.

Judge Mr Justice Nicol said the Sun had proved what was in the article to be "substantially true".

He found 12 of the 14 alleged incidents of domestic violence had occurred."

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-54779430

[(Anonymous)]

Same anon: I will admit that I misworded my original comment. I didn't mean that losing a libel case automatically means it's true. I meant that in THIS CASE he lost because the judge concluded it was true.

[(Anonymous)]

I understand, you can disregard my comment then.