[ SECRET POST #5208 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5208 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.
[Shoot 'Em Up (resized)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Banana Fish]


__________________________________________________















05. [SPOILERS for Kids Baking Championship]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Big Little Lies S2]
[WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]

[ID: Invaded]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of noncon (probably?)]
https://i.imgur.com/qhjWFCS.png
[image linked for above warning]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #745.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: tw: pedophilia, csa

[(Anonymous)]

NA - Nice to meet you. I used to have anti opinions, and I wasn't pro-doxxing or any of that stuff. I thought DD:DNE stuff (which wasn't called that yet) was gross and that you were fucked up if you liked it. I supported civilly criticizing of that content (at the time I thought it was important to be visibly critical of it because I believed it was toxic), but I was against personal attacks, sending hate, doxxing, etc.

Eventually I realized I was wrong, and now I'm staunchly on the YKINMKATIOK side.

Re: tw: pedophilia, csa

[(Anonymous)]

Oh dear, the whole point of the anti-sphere (one that they openly embraced) was that "civil criticism" was still enabling.

Re: tw: pedophilia, csa

[(Anonymous)]

So you're saying that despite the fact I have openly expressed my former status as a semi-anti, I...wasn't anti enough to qualify? I mean, current me, who is very much not an anti even of the semi variety, would like to think that's true, but I don't think it is.

And I'm certainly not the only one of my kind I've ever seen. I think there are way more semi-antis out there than frothing at the mouth antis. It's just the latter kind is a lot more vocal and a lot more visible, by their very nature.

Re: tw: pedophilia, csa

[(Anonymous)]

DA

There is a 99.9% chance that what you considered "civilly criticizing" is what every reasonable person would consider harassment.

Re: tw: pedophilia, csa

[(Anonymous)]

That's a nice statistic you made up. Did you know 98% of made up statistics are actually completely inaccurate?

What I considered "civil criticism" at the time when I was a semi-anti was in fact civil criticism. No ill-wishing or threats. No casting aspersions or speculating on a person's character. No ad hominem of any kind. No swearing at people. No viciousness.

*shrugs* Believe me or don't. It changes nothing. But if it bothers you that someone can occupy any sort of gray area in this whole thing—can be wrong without being viciously and blindly dogmatic about it—that need to square everything away to black and white is all you.