case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-04-09 05:22 pm

[ SECRET POST #5208 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5208 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.
[Shoot 'Em Up (resized)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Banana Fish]


__________________________________________________















05. [SPOILERS for Kids Baking Championship]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Big Little Lies S2]
[WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of suicide]

[ID: Invaded]


__________________________________________________



08. [WARNING for discussion of rape]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of noncon (probably?)]
https://i.imgur.com/qhjWFCS.png
[image linked for above warning]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #745.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-04-10 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
While I sort of get what you're saying, individual published and aspiring to be published authors are mostly writing for money, even when they're also passionate about a project.

Until creative types are all paid a generous wage up front to create and share their work with the world, evaluating works based on the purity of their authors' intentions mostly comes across as saying artists who want to be paid for their work are somehow lesser, leaving hereditary million and billionaires pretty much the only authors capable of "purity." No thanks.