case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-04-14 06:45 pm

[ SECRET POST #5213 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5213 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 15 secrets from Secret Submission Post #746.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-04-14 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
To be honest I would find an attempt to validate oppression to be really gross and offensive. It's oppression. Oppression shouldn't be validated.

nayrt

(Anonymous) 2021-04-15 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
You're absolutely right. Any quality "both sides" setting needs both sides to have enough agency so that it's not about oppression of one side by the other. Both can be shitty, or both can have excellent points, either way, but a good story doesn't automatically have one side in complete control over the other. They both need to have a more or less equal chance at succeeding in the overall setting, regardless of player choices or storyline beats or whatever is driving the narrative.