case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-05-21 03:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #5250 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5250 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________


03.



__________________________________________________


04.
[Lux-Pain]


__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________


06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________
















08. [WARNING for discussion of underage ships]

[Jujutsu Kaisen]


__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of gore, rape]

[Evenicle]


__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of sexual harassment]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #751.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-05-22 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
No it's not that, it's like... how do you find out they're survivors? By asking them very personal questions, very much unlike for example, race which is usually visible up front?

Being like, "don't blacklist survivors" is different from that contextually. It's just an awkward way to phrase it.

Plus this anon had a good point: "I do not think a guy who has just made a big public mess about shitting on survivors should go out of his way to put himself as the boss of more survivors." Yeah...

(Anonymous) 2021-05-22 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
How is it NOT obvious that "Hire survivors" means "Hire people who have spoken out on their own before about being survivors" (of which there are plenty), and not "Ask every candidate to share their background as part of the interview process"? It really is deliberate obtuseness and derailment of the point to even entertain that it might mean the latter.